“Pharaoh remarked, ‘My Nile is mine, and I created myself.’”

Monday, March 29th, 2010

 

The basic difference between heart and mind is that the heart lives for itself.

The self is its ultimate point of reference and the ultimate objective of all its desires.

By contrast, the brain, the faculty of perception, is the power to absorb and relate to matters that are outside and beyond the self.

Indeed, the basis of all perception is the surrender of the egotistical "I" of the heart.

As long as the "I" is defined solely by the self and its own needs, it cannot assimilate any objective truth, anything that is beyond the self.

Thus, the "abode" of the Godly soul in the human body is the brain, where there is "abnegation" (bittul) of the self to another, higher reality.

The Baal HaTanya defines the ultimate kelipah (concealment of holiness) as Pharaoh's remark, "My Nile is mine, and I created myself."

When someone says, "This is mine," this is a certain degree of tumah ("profanity"); when he adds, "and I created myself," it is the ultimate profanity.

The circuit is closed completely; the kelipah is hermetically sealed.

If I made myself for myself, then the "I" is the beginning and end of all existence, and this is the ultimate descent from holiness.

In contrast, each level of holiness is a level of self-negation.

The highest level of holiness is that of the merkavah (literally, "chariot"), a state in which a person's individuality is completely negated and he operates as a vehicle, a mere tool, of the supernal will alone.

Holiness is not merely the concept that I did not create myself, but also that the "Nile" (that is, the things that are ostensibly in my domain and control) does not belong to me.

At this level, words such as "my" and "mine" are unutterable.

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From Opening the Tanya p.224, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“Not all Passover seders are equally beautiful”

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

 

"To be sure, not all sedarim are equally beautiful.

But as long as even one of the people present really feels the meaning of the occasion, that meaning is conveyed in some degree to the others." 



–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

In Teshuvah, p. 118, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 

“Leaving one world for another” from Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

Friday, March 26th, 2010

"The exodus from Egypt, considered the archetype of spiritual liberation, takes place in two stages: the moment of hesitation and the moment of release.

The Jewish people hesitate at the shore of the Red Sea, then, suddenly, Nahshon leaps into the deep water.

In other words, even with the help of numerous miracles and the pressure of a cruel enemy in hot pursuit, a crucial pause halts the steady onward march.

One runs up against a barrier that cannot be traversed except by making a bold decision, taking a chance, and jumping.

Such hurdles are always part of teshuvah, but they are immeasurably more difficult when, as in our time, teshuvah is a matter of summoning the strength to leave one world for another."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 

From Teshuvah, p. 9, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

Five Teachings for Pesach from Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

 

"Times of crises give us opportunities for a new outlook"

“Passover is the most ancient Jewish festival, and also the most beloved.

Yet beyond the splendor of its antiquity and our own childhood memories, Passover’s message is both universal and contemporary:

Each of us yearns for the move from enslavement to exile.

The heartfelt desire for deliverance — redemption from slavery — is not confined to those in captivity.

One’s personal ‘Egypt’ may be literal, physical bondage.

But others may experience their own ‘Egypt’ as financial ruin, the exile of one’s soul or the relentless heartache within one’s own family.

The defining feature of bondage is not a one-time trauma; it lies in its span, sometimes a whole course of life.

Whether one’s bondage is obvious to all or known only to the sufferer, it is a reality from which the sufferer cannot pull free.

And because the sufferer does not have the tools or the abilities to liberate himself, everyone – both the complete heretic and the sage – yearns, with or without prayer, for a miracle. 

Even the attempt to escape is not a full answer; the straits may be too high, and possibly also too deep.

The Exodus from Egypt is miraculous.

A pit with a ladder in it is a pit, but there is a clear way out of it.

Egypt is a dead-end labyrinth, an abyss with no staircase.

Had ‘Egypt’ been a solvable problem, on either the individual or the national level, surely many would have found a way to leave.

The festival of the Exodus from Egypt therefore carries an important and significant message for every human being – namely, that there is a precedent for the miracle of deliverance, that there even is a memory of such an event.

And thus the story of the Exodus is imprinted in each of us. 

Even those of weak faith can see the Exodus as the symbol of liberation from a difficult and bitter exile.

Unfortunately, there is no formula for reaching the Exodus, neither a five-year plan nor a twelve-step program.

But there is one element that can be identified:

What seems to be the peak of enslavement is, in fact, the beginning of redemption.

Just before the miracle of the Exodus the Torah tells us (Exodus 1:14) ‘and they [the Egyptians] made their [the Israelites'] lives bitter.’

Why so?

Enslavement, in all its forms, is painful, limiting and confining; but because it is not a one-time event, we adapt.

It is not that we like our troubles; it is that we are used to them.

We learn to co-exist, to lead a life in which man and his suffering, external or internal, live side by side.

There is pain, there is distress, but there is also resignation, even if unwilling, to the existing situation.

A reality of this kind is in itself a barrier to liberation.

A person who has been living for a long time behind walls may be unable to step out even when the gate opens.

And such a person will surely not have the courage to make an illogical jump in order to escape his present situation.

However, when people reach a deeper understanding of their distress, when they reach the level of ‘and the children of Israel sighed by reason of the bondage, and they cried’ (Ibid, 2:23), this in itself is the beginning of the possibility of being redeemed.

Bitterness emerges not only out of the pain, but also from the shattering of the compliance with the state of bondage.

That bitter suffering is not the solution; it is the moment of realization, a more profound understanding of our travail.

Out of this moment comes the opening for a new paradigm, a new reality.

Times of crises, such as our own times, are not only periods of human and social tragedies.

They also give us opportunities for a new outlook and a clearer examination of the past and of the present.

A new perception of reality — one that does not focus on particular details but also sees the broad social, economic and human situation — is in itself the beginning of redemption.

One must want to be redeemed, in order to be redeemed.

Before we eat the matzah (which is both a symbol of redemption and ‘the bread of affliction’) we remove the leaven, bi’ur chametz.

Leaven is bread which is very edible, possibly tastier than matzah, which symbolizes all the more bearable aspects of bondage.

We are called upon to burn, even if only symbolically, the leaven that has accumulated in the past year, perhaps also in the course of a whole generation, so that we can begin to create an atmosphere of redemption. 

On the Seder night we gather for a festive meal, and the festival table in every Jewish home – even if it is neither glamorous nor bountiful – is a reminder of a most important fact: that the Israelites were redeemed not only in the past, and that in the future, too, there is the “Redeemer of Israel.”

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz



"The central ceremony of Passover takes place in the home, not in the synagogue"

“The sense of family is an integral part of all Jewish holidays, but it is even stronger during the festival of Passover. 

The central ceremony of Passover is the seder, which takes place in the home, not in the synagogue. 

And the key element of the seder is in telling the story of our (physical and spiritual) enslavement, our (physical) liberation, and the attainment of our (spiritual) destiny at Mount Sinai – that is, the reaffirmation of our identity as the House of Israel.

This Wednesday night, Jewish families throughout the world will come together and read from the Haggadah, the text of the seder. 

They will begin to tell the story by pointing to the matzah, the unleavened bread, and declaring: 

‘This is the bread of affliction, which our ancestors ate in the land of Egypt. 

Let all who are hungry come and eat. Let all who are needy come and celebrate Passover.’

As we look at the matzah and remember our history – when we were hungry and needy, yes, but also when we were all together – we realize that part of the family is missing. 

There are empty chairs in the house, where a son or a daughter or a cousin ought to be.

We issue the invitation and we open the door, but some of them are so far away – from us and from Judaism – that they don’t hear our invitation or see the light from the open door. 

If every Jew who cares about the members of the Jewish family will issue the invitation and open the door, many of these estranged Jews will hear or see, and drop in for a visit – if not to his own house, then to the house of a long-lost cousin.

Let us welcome them back.”

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz


"Why is This Generation Different From All Other Generations?"

The seder is a singular event in the Jewish calendar, requiring days, or even weeks, of preparation. 

When we sit down at the table, at last, and coax the youngest participant to ask Ma Nishtana, we know exactly what is different, and how much effort it took to make it different.

The next set of questions — those asked by the Four Sons, or the Four Children — addresses a larger issue. 

According to one perspective, the Four Sons represent four generations of the Jewish people. 

This leads us to the wider question I have posed above. A different night is one thing, but a whole different generation?

The first generation is not only wise, but enthusiastic — or perhaps it is enthusiastic because it is wise. It has received a solid Jewish education and is steeped in Jewish life and Jewish culture. Its members ask questions so as to broaden and deepen their commitment.

The second generation is wicked (the language is harsh, but it’s the text we have): This generation may have learned the “behavioral” part of Judaism, but it has missed the spiritual and the inspirational elements. Lacking a meaningful understanding of Pesach — and, indeed, of Judaism – it rebels.

The third generation asks a question that is almost primitive: “What is this?” This generation is ignorant, too ignorant to be rebellious. Yet the grandchild notices unfamiliar objects and actions, and so he approaches the grandfather with his questions.

The child of the fourth generation, however, is not motivated to ask, and would not even know what or whom to ask. No one in his orbit is Jewishly knowledgeable or Jewishly connected. His grandfather is a member of the second generation, the one who rebelled against the Jewish heritage and rejected it. He has no memories and no context.

Throughout our history, and in almost every country of our dispersion — with the noteworthy exception of the United States — others have tried to destroy us with hate. 

Today, however, the biggest problem — especially in the United States — is that we are being decimated by “love,” as, one by one, Jews are voluntarily surrendering their Judaism on an unprecedented scale.

Our response to this threat must also occur one-to-one. 

At the seder, and every day, we must respond to our children’s curiosity with substance and we must meet their passion with our own. 

We must assure that we live a Judaism that is fresh and vigorous and compelling, so that every generation will be able to establish itself as a first generation that is both wise and enthusiastic.

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz


"One may jest, one may ask questions, one may play"

The external framework of the seder, despite it being fixed, is not rigid; it allows, and even encourages, the introduction of changes and innovations.

Not only were new sections added to the text of the Haggadah over the generations from time to time, but the text itself, by its very nature, demands completion.

In each generation parents and children are again asked to think about the enslavement and liberation from Egypt—to discuss them, study them, and to examine the many points at which present-day life meets, identifies with and clashes with the Passover Haggadah.

Essentially, everyone is asked to add to the story, to perfect it and to “relate the Exodus from Egypt” at least for “that entire night.”

For this reason, there is no hard and fast rule as to how one is to read the Haggadah and who is to read it.

If they wish, the members of the household may ask the oldest one to read it and to explain;

if they prefer, they may all read it together;

if they wish to sing the text, fine;

if they prefer it may be read without song and melody.

Whoever wishes to ask questions is invited to ask, whether young or old–the wise child, the wicked one, the stupid one.

And whoever wishes to answer or to discuss the matter is praiseworthy.

The night of the seder expresses that characteristic of Judaism which was succinctly put by one of the Hassidic teachers: “’You shall be a holy people unto Me’–that your holiness shall be human.”

Thus, the atmosphere at the seder may not be one of scorn or joking, but of respect for the sacred—but in a human manner.

One may jest;

one may ask questions;

one may play.

The afikoman is “stolen,” one acts out the Exodus from Egypt, and once again this Jewish family, which is now celebrating the Passover Seder, is connected with the entire Jewish people, in all places and throughout the generations.

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz



"We Become Children Once Again"

The whole Passover ritual could be summarized in a single commandment: “You shall tell your son.”

This is why at the beginning of the Haggadah the child asks four questions: “Why is this night different from all other nights? Why do we only eat matzah?” and so forth.

According to the law, if there is no child present, or if an adult celebrates Passover alone, he must ask the questions, even though he is supposed to “know” the answers.

It is customary in certain communities for adults to ask the questions, because on Passover, we should, in a sense, become children.

This is also why in the Bible, Passover is called the “spring holiday.” On Passover, nature as a whole begins to blossom and man’s renewal coincides with that of nature.

The Sages have pointed to the parallel between the word nitsan, “bud,” and Nisan, the month in which Passover takes place.

It is a true renaissance. We become children once again, and all we can do is ask questions.

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“To be truly free”

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

 

"Freedom and slavery appear to be simple opposites, each defined as the absence of the other. 

Slavery, the absence of freedom.

Freedom, the absence of slavery.

But each of these terms must be understood without reference to the other.

Throwing off one’s fetters does not necessarily mean that one has entered into a state of freedom.

Slavery is that condition in which a person is always subject to the will of another.

Freedom, on the other hand, is the ability to act on, and carry out, one’s own independent will.

The individual who lacks a will of his own does not become free once he is unshackled.

He is simply a slave without a master, or,in the case of a people,those whose overlords have abandoned them.

Between ceasing to be a slave and acquiring freedom, the individual must thus pass through an intermediate stage in his progress, without which he cannot become truly free. 

He must develop inner qualities of his own.

The miracle of the Exodus was not completed with the people’s departure from the house of bondage.

They needed to develop to become a truly free people and not merely runaway slaves."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From Pebbles of Wisdom from Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, p.100 

“The path of faith”

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

"The people of Israel were slaves in body, mind, and spirit. 


They had no spiritual content or any real goal in life. 

The only thing they did have was a vague sense of continuity, an obscure link with their forefathers.

This is what prevented them from assimilating completely with the Egyptians and what prepared them for what they were about to be given.

Then came the call to depart from Egypt. 

The very desire for freedom was a tremendous revolution in the soul of this nation of slaves. 

It was the awakening of the need for inner freedom that exists in the soul of every individual.

Although they did not yet know God and had no idea as to how the Exodus would in fact occur, they believed. 

The slaves had neither knowledge nor understanding, and yet they went out into an unknown and unmapped desert.

Such a spark of faith can enable those who possess it to overcome all dangers and obstacles.

This path of faith is almost bereft of profound intellectual content, but it creates a link that goes much deeper than that of any other kind. 

It is a relationship of devotion, of inner oneness beyond perception, with the Divine.

This decision, this inexplicable faith, conceals the seeds of all that will in due course be revealed. 

This is where the relationship begins and where its character is shaped. 

The overt, external revelation occurs at a later stage. 

But the inner, essential relationship is there from the very beginning, from the very first act of faith.

This is why the people of Israel were able to say, prior to the giving of Torah,'We shall do and we shall harken' (Exodus 24:7), because their essential link with the Torah, although hidden, was there from the first."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From Pebbles of Wisdom from Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, p. 48

“The decision to follow God”

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

 

 
"The essence of the Exodus
 
is in the initial, faith-motivated decision
 
to leave the ordinary, the routine life, and
 
to follow God.

This is the all-inclusive point of departure.

Prior to that, there is nothing."
 
 
–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

From Pebbles of Wisdom from Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz,  p, 3.

“It was said of a certain Tzadik that when he prayed he looked like a burnt-out wick”

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

 

When a person does a mitzvah, he does not necessarily add anything to himself, but when a person studies Torah, he does acquire something.

Also when one prays one does not necessarily acquire anything.

On the contrary, it is said that a person should not even enjoy it.

If he gets pleasure out of prayer, out of seeing himself in the act of prayer, he should perhaps do something else.

A Tzadik once went to an extreme in this respect—saying that he preferred someone who said that he fasted from one Sabbath to the next to someone who actually fasted, because a person who claims to fast deceives only others whereas a person who actually fasts deceives himself.

So long as there is a feeling of triumph or satisfaction, the point is missed. What should remain has to be more in the nature of burnt ashes, or, at the highest level, no residue at all.

The peak experience should be beyond all feeling, or the capacity to talk about it.
 
It is also maintained that the highest level of prayer cannot be visible from the outside.

When someone is visibly devout in prayer, the prayer is likely to fall short of the highest.

It was said of a certain Tzadik that when he prayed he looked like a burnt-out wick.

He was nonexistent.

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From In the Beginning, p.147, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“God would not appreciate a fool’s deal”

Friday, March 19th, 2010

"What should be remembered is that we are not expected to do teshuvah in a conventional universe.

 

We do teshuvah in a universe that is quite unaware of physical laws.

A universe in which the present, the future, and the past merge into a timeless duration.

 

A universe in which a lethal arrow is liable to fly back and to be as free of all suspicion as if it had never left its quiver.

 

In a word, through repentance we penetrate into a sort of physical weightlessness, where we can choose, for instance, to reverse our conventional value by replacing a plus sign with a minus sign, or vice versa.

 

There are things on this lowly earth of which we are particularly fond, but each of us has his own peculiarities in this regard.

 

To give money, for instance, is for some of us a molehill, whereas to apologize for having offended someone is a mountain.

 

Now beware!

 

If you offer a sacrifice to God, make sure that you offer what really costs you dear, for God would not appreciate a fool's deal."

 

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 

From "Teshuvah" in The Strife of the Spirit, p.99, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“The soul must train itself in order to be capable of achieving meaningful religious experience”

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

 

"The lower a creature is on the ladder of evolution, the more it is subject to the demands of its instincts, that is, to its natural spontaneity. 

Each higher level of development demands a further release from these pressures and their displacement by processes of learning and training. 

A child cannot learn to walk without a long period of preparation. 

Now this is a relatively simple motor function, and it is obvious that psychological activities, which are more complex and subtle, require even more training and conditioning. 

A total spontaneity of love, for instance, rarely occurs in man (in most animals it is a function of the sexual cycle), for the feelings involved are much too complex and are, to a large extent, learned.

Many Jewish sages have noted that the two Hebrew words emunah (faith) and emun (training) are derived from the same root, and they have interpreted this as showing that the soul must train itself in order to be capable of achieving meaningful religious experience. 

This need for training, however, does not mean that there is no place for spontaneous religious experience, but rather that such spontaneous experience by itself cannot serve as the basis of the religious life. 

Only by cultivating awareness and understanding, by conscious, ongoing preparation can a person draw from the inner resources in his soul the capacity for meaningful and profound experience."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz 
 
From "A Time for Joy," p. 97 in The Strife of the Spirit by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 

“Abstract reasoning and the dialectic method became an integral part of the Jewish culture”

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

"In the opinion of virtually every modern scholar, 'the Talmud was never closed'—not only in the historical-factual sense, but also with regard to the manner of its understanding and study. 


The method of Talmud study was an extension of the Talmud itself.

Its interpretation and analysis required the student continually to involve himself in the discussion, to evaluate its questions and argumentation. 

As a result, abstract reasoning and the dialectic method became an integral part of the Jewish culture.

The open-ended character of talmudic discussion did not detract from the reverence felt toward the Talmud as a text with religious sanc¬tity. 

The methods of study, like the conclusions of the work itself, became the undisputed basis for religious legislation in all subsequent generations. 

Both medieval Jewish philosophy and Jewish mysticism, despite an ambivalent attitude toward the exclusive study of Talmud, treated the Talmud with great respect, and later kabbalistic literature even found in it concealed allusions to mystical truths. 

In the final analysis, the Talmud was understood as, and in fact created, the unique phenomenon of "sacred intellectualism."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From "Talmud" in The Strife of the Spirit, p. 83, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“Jewish thought uses pictorial or imagery concepts instead of abstract concepts”

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

"Modern Western thought is characterized by an extensive use of abstract concepts that exist and operate within a more general abstract system. 


Jewish thought, on the other hand, has, with very few exceptions, done without them. 

Abstract concepts are not to be found in the Bible, the Talmud, or even in relatively modern Chasidic texts. 

Indeed, with such a small number of abstract concepts, it would appear to be almost impossible for Jewish writings to express anything profound. 

This, of course, is not true, and although they employ few abstract concepts, Jewish writings do deal with abstractions. 

Furthermore, Jewish literature is distinguished by a progressive abstraction of ideas, and thus the absence of abstract concepts cannot be attributed to the antiquity of the texts.

It is, of course, quite impossible to manipulate complex and abstract ideas without concepts, and Jewish sources do employ them. 

The concepts used, however, are not abstract but rather plastic and depictive, and they communicate their meaning rather like a metaphor or a visual representation. 

In other words, Jewish thought uses pictorial or imagery concepts instead of abstract concepts. The imagery concepts used are frequently derived from the commonplace, from everyday life and work.

For example, legal texts frequently use words and phrases like 'horn,' 'tooth,''foot,' 'warned,' and 'the blow of a hammer.' 

The latter phrase, for example, encompasses the entire range of activities, that, using abstract concepts, we would call 'the completion of a task.' 

It may seem strange to us, but Jewish legal texts will say of a man who makes a collar for a garment on the Sabbath that he is culpable because of 'the blow of the hammer.' 

Furthermore, a wealth of such phrases and imagery concepts are used in the Kabbalah and the Aggadah to express abstractions that would be described in other systems by means of abstract concepts. 

Once one has become accustomed to these imagery concepts, they can be seen to be no less effective in expressing abstractions than the abstract concepts with which we are familiar."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From "The Imagery Concept in Jewish Thought" from The Strife of the Spirit, p. 62, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“A man can create an angel”

Monday, March 15th, 2010

"There are cases in which angels are manifest in 'ordinary' form, are clothed in familiar material garments, and appear to be natural phenomena. 


On such occasions, the viewer will encounter difficulties in deciding whether an apparition or a natural object stands before him, whether the pillar of fire or the man he perceives belongs to this world, with its own system of natural causality, or to another. 

Furthermore, the angel, that is, the force sent from a higher world, may not only be manifest in the physical world, but may also appear to act according to, and be governed by, the laws of nature, either totally or to a limited degree. 

In such cases, only prophetic insight can determine whether, and to what extent, higher forces are active.

The fact that a man can create an angel, which is instantaneously transposed to another world, is not, in itself, a supernatural event.

It is a part of a day-to-day way of life that can on occasion seem ordinary and commonplace—the life of mitzvot. 

When we perform an action that results in the creation of an angel, we are generally aware of no more than that we are acting on, and within, the physical world. 

Similarly, the appearance of an angel does not necessarily involve a deviation from the normal laws of physical nature.

Man is thus in close contact with the upper worlds, and though the actual route, the nature of the link, is hidden, the fact of the relationship is as axiomatic as the duality of his body and soul, of matter and spirit. 

Man does not pause to wonder every time he moves from the physical to the spiritual part of the World of Action, and takes for granted the occasional penetration of higher worlds into our world."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From "Worlds, Angels and Men," p. 48 in The Strife of the Spirit by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“To find God in all thoughts and desires”

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

 

"Man does not have to elevate his soul, because it is already high without man's efforts.

His task is to elevate his body, his intellect, his desires. 

The human being is to give all his essence to God, but not by elevating his mind to higher subjects and converting his desires into a desire for God. 

The real way is higher: to find God in all these thoughts and desires, to be a whole man—but to a higher degree."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
From "Human Holiness" in The Strife of the Spirit, p.41, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“The timeless content and meaning of scriptural sources”

Friday, March 12th, 2010

 

"In order to comprehend what a particular sage, kabbalist, or prophet meant, it is necessary to be familiar with the historic context within which he wrote and lived, with his personality, point of view, and even the manners and customs implicit in the text. 

Only then will it be possible to extract its more universal, human message. 

Although the words were originally intended for the writer's contemporaries, all generations of Jewish sages expressed themselves by means of imagery conceptualization of abstractions. 

If we approach the task in the proper way, we, too, shall be able to find the general meaning. 

Once we grasp what they were saying for their own time, we shall be able to understand what they are still telling us today.

The search to discover the timeless content and meaning of scriptural sources should therefore be conducted in the same way that the halachah is approached. 

First, a careful inquiry must be made to establish the exact meaning of the passage as it is expressed in the original text, and then the general meaning must be extracted. 

Let us take as an example of the halachic approach the treatment of the biblical precept, 'And if an ox gores a man . . .' 

The idea here is straightforward, and the meaning is clear. 

A simple, concrete situation is described. 

Nevertheless, it is necessary to ask whether the animal involved is necessarily only an ox. 

Could it not also be a donkey, a dog, or a bird? 

And is 'to gore' only one, specific type of injury, or could it also be applied to biting or kicking? 

After such questions are posed, and the text is carefully analyzed, both intrinsically and by comparison with parallel passages, all according to the techniques of traditional hermeneutics, halachic conclusions are drawn, and it is seen that this particular case of an ox goring a man can be expressed in the abstract, in terms of 'animals' that attack and 'injure' people."

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
 
 From "The Imagery Concept in Jewish Thought" in The Strife of the Spirit, p. 68 by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz 

“Empty peace of mind”

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

 

"The quest for peace in all its forms is quite ancient, as old as mankind itself.


So, too, is the elevation of peace as a supreme value. 


Nevertheless, there is still room to question the notion of peace of mind and its place in the hierarchy of human needs. 


What, first of all, does it really mean? 


One important definition is provided by the Jewish sages in the context of a lengthy discussion of the many virtues of peace: 


"The Holy One, blessed be He, found no vessel but peace which could contain all blessing." 


This beautiful passage, which makes peace the very basis of all good things, goes on to make a telling distinction– 


Peace is a vessel that can contain blessing, but it can also contain nothing at all, can be an empty vessel. 


Here is a truth with wide applicability, be it in the international or the interpersonal realm, or in the life of the individual soul. 


Peace with no content, meaningless tranquillity, rest without sanctity—all are empty vessels. 


At best, the emptiness is soon filled with positive content. 


In all too many cases, however, the empty vessel becomes a repository for whatever comes along. 


In the absence of anything else, rubbish and abomination can fill the void. 



It is the same with empty peace of mind. 


The tension and pressure seem to be gone, but nothing positive comes to take their place. 


A vacuum results, an existence devoid of effort or thought, which is in no sense better than what preceded it. 


A life of vain struggle can be relieved of pressure and anxiety and yet remain as vacuous and meaningless as before. 


However, while stress is likely (particularly when unremitting) to be unpleasant, it has the potential of achieving meaningful, valuable change. 


–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
 
 
From The Strife of the Spirit, p.6, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“Does the Divine knowledge of what will happen determine the human choice or is man genuinely free to decide for himself?”

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

"There have been many allegorical explanations to answer this question, but we may point to more familiar examples from contemporary science. 


A clinical psychologist performing an experiment may ask certain questions of his subjects and, although he is quite sure of what the answer will be, knowing his subject's personality, he will refrain from exerting any influence.

 

Hence the answer, even if known beforehand by the scientist, is freely chosen and therefore valid in terms of the experiment.


In terms of Divine providence, however, what is the purpose of testing someone if the results are already known?


A medieval Sage, the Ramban, has ventured the opinion that it is necessary in order for an action to emerge from the realm of the potential to the manifest; a person has to earn the reward for a good deed and not for a good intention.


The trials and tests a man is made to undergo are not meant to provide God with information that He already knows.

They are meant to help a person realize the greater potential in him, to reinforce his capacity to overcome difficulties and to create something new. 


It is a way of letting spiritual powers become expressed in practice.


The emphasis is not on God's knowing but on knowing as a human experience."


–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 

From The Candle of God, p. 201, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“After the death of the body, the soul returns and is reincarnated in the body of another person”

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

"It has been said that each of the letters of the Torah has some corresponding soul.


That is to say, every soul is a letter in the entire Torah, and has its own part to play.


The soul that has fulfilled its task, that has done what it has to do in terms of creating or repairing its own part of the world and realizing its own essence, can wait after death for the perfec­tion of the world as a whole.


But not all the souls are so privileged.

 

Many stray for one reason or another.

 

Sometimes a person does not do all the proper things, and sometimes he misuses forces and spoils his portion and the portion of others.


In such cases the soul does not complete its task and may even itself be damaged by contact with the world.


It has not managed to complete that por­tion of reality which only this particular soul can complete.

 

And therefore after the death of the body, the soul returns and is reincarnated in the body of another person and again must try and complete what it failed to correct or what it injured in the past." 


–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 

From The Thirteen Petalled Rose, p. 63, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“The Torah does not really limit the activities of an individual in any field of endeavor”

Monday, March 8th, 2010

 

"By definition, the way of the Torah is not religious in the strict sense of addressing only that part of a person's life concerned only with relations between the human and the Divine.

 

The Torah is not a narrow domain of holiness a man may enter or leave as he chooses while the domain of ordinary existence remains neutral territory, where God does not interfere much, and where in any case there is not much point in trying to relate to Him.

 

Since the Torah is the blueprint of the world, it regulates the whole and cannot be confined to any particular part.

 

True, its directives are not all on the same level of practicality; nevertheless, its instructions and guidelines and modes of relating are valid for all situations in life.

 

The more one becomes identified with the Torah,the more does its significance expand beyond particular circumstance.

 

Rather than constituting itself an ideal for the monastic life, say, or a guide or for any other sort of separa­tion from the reality of the world, Torah works in precisely the opposite fashion, introducing more content and meaning into the trivial details of the life of the world.

 

One finds the Torah significant in every aspect of community, commerce, agricul­ture, and industry, in the life of feeling and love, in relations between the sexes — down to the most minute aspects of living, like buttoning one's shoes or lying down to sleep.

 

What is surprising is that with the great quantity and range of its laws, what to do and what not to do, Torah still does not really limit the activities of an individual in any field of endeavor.

 

That is to say, there is no field of action or thought which, in principle, the Torah repudiates. 

 

The Law, in general and in detail, the­oretically and practically, mostly adds detail to action, qualifies modes of behavior, imposes new modes, directs the conduct of one's daily business from waking to sleeping–the supposition being that if all these actions are properly defined and prepared, then the guidance of the Law need not and does not change their essence, but adds a quality to them."


–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 

From The Thirteen Petalled Rose, p. 94, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“Each man possesses two souls, one animal, the other divine”

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

"According to the Kabbalah (in the form expressed in hasidic literature), each man possesses two souls, one animal, the other divine.

 

The animal spirit is the vital force that gives life to the body, though it possesses, in addition, spiritual components that are oriented beyond this function and do not exist purely as ends in themselves.

 

The divine soul reflects the pure inner essence of humanity, its yearning toward the divine; it is unconnected to the body or its needs, which, indeed, it frequently overcomes.

 

It aspires to be and do good.

 

Every man's life is an ongoing struggle between these two souls, each of which strives to capture and dominate the individual." 


–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

From The Tales of Rabbi Nachman, p. 85, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“Why Rabbi Nachman chose the format of storytelling”

Friday, March 5th, 2010

 

“Rabbi Nachman himself explained why he chose the particular format of storytelling, rather than direct statements of Torah teaching.

 

In order to absorb knowledge and a message from well constructed and direct Torah teaching, one has first of all to be knowledgeable to a certain extent.

 

More than that, one has to make a conscious effort to learn while one hears any direct statements.

 

At the same time, one has to have a willingness to accept what one hears.

 

Rabbi Nachman stated in his symbolic form that the stories he was telling were even for people who had been sleeping, in a way, for seventy years, meaning that the message in the stories somehow gets to them, even when they are not consciously thinking about it as a teaching.

 

Rabbi Nachman avoids the possibility of evoking antagonism from the reader who might react to or be unable to accept direct statements.

 

His stories seep in and later on do the work.

 

Because of that, even though the stories can be misunderstood, somehow the inner content does not get lost, and afterward, in one way or another, it has some impact on the reader."

 

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 From The Tales of Rabbi Nachman, p. 275, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“As a rule, the Oral Torah was not written down”

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

"For hundreds and thousands of years, the Oral Torah (as the name implies) had consisted of verbal transmission of the tradition from master to student, with nothing committed to writing.

 

The tradition passed from one Beit Midrash to another, which from generation to generation changed their character and methods of study.

 

One element, however, remained stable throughout: the tradition was oral, not written.

 

It is true that in earlier times, and even during the Temple period, Torah scholars would make mnemonic notes for themselves, but these were no more than shorthand comments on unusual events or decisions which the writers saw fit to record for posterity.

 

As a rule, the Oral Torah was not written down.

 

These scrolls, known as 'hidden scrolls' and not meant for public use, were neither studied nor used for teaching, and were preserved only as the personal memoranda of individual Sages.

 

Moreover, there was a halachic ruling to the effect that 'the words which are written, you are not at liberty to say by heart, and the words transmitted orally, you are not at liberty to commit to writing' (Gittin 60b).

 

One reason given for this was that an oral doctrine enables maximum flexibility in transmission and interpretation, whereas a written text is bound to reach, at a certain stage, a point of ossification beyond which it cannot be developed.

 

Exposition of a written text becomes by nature supplemental, while the text itself is no longer renewed and invigorated.

 

Thus, alongside the written Torah there coexisted a more flexible tradition, which conveyed a practical understanding of the Torah's basic terms and concepts and, above all, explained the actual practice of its commandments.

 

All this had been transmitted in an ancient chain of tradition stretching from Moses through the whole list of Sages detailed in Pirkei Avot (chapters 1-2) until Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi's (Rebbi's) generation.

 

This heritage was zealously preserved as an oral tradition, not to be recorded, not to be petrified.

 

Despite these and many other considerations, Rebbi decided that the time had come to change the method of preserving the Oral Torah by establishing hard and fast rules for guiding its interpretation and formulating it in a specific, clearly defined way that would meet the needs of the time."

 

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 From Talmudic Images, p.84, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“Talmudic controversies”

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

 

"For a Talmudic Sage to express a minority opinion was not unusual.

 

In various controversies, Sages would sometimes express majority opinions, and at other times would be in the minority.

 

Even when the ruling went against the opinion of a particular individual, he was not required to change his mind.

 

He was, however, obligated to acquiesce to the halachic ruling of the majority."

 

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 From Talmudic Images, p. 59 , by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“One must not judge others by the same criteria that one uses to judge oneself”

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

 

"Hillel (d.10 CE) was famous as a lover of humanity, and even more for his appreciation of the uniqueness of each person he encountered.

 

He was known for his ability to address each one who approached him in a way that was most appropriate for that person.

 

An interesting expression of this ideal is his attempt to summarize the Torah on 'one leg': 'Do not do unto others what you would not have them do unto you.'

 

This negative formulation of the Biblical passage, 'Love your neighbor as yourself' (Leviticus 19: 18), expresses most aptly the notion that each of us has unique qualities, and therefore one must not judge others by the same criteria that one uses to judge oneself."

 

–Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 From Talmudic Images, p.6 by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

“It is inappropriate to erect mausoleums on the graves of scholars”

Monday, March 1st, 2010

 

"The heroes of the Oral Torah are heroes of a special kind.

 

Their stories are not tales of war and battles, and their chronicles are devoid of impressive events.

 

These heroes are heroes of the spirit, whose acts of heroism lie in their thoughts and their words.

 

The palaces and fortresses they established are invisible to the eye.

 

The Talmudic Sages themselves declared that it is inappropriate to erect mausoleums on the graves of scholars, since their teachings are their monuments."

 –Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz

 

From Talmudic Images, p. xiii, by Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz